Site: Trust, yet verify

Slant: Sceptic

Active: yes

Topics in which I have an interest are: catastrophic anthropogenic global warming & climate change, renewable energy sources, science communication, alarmism, media,… but especially the view of the layman in these issues.

Recent Articles

Trust, yet verify: Claim: contract prices for solar and wind power increasingly comparable or lower than generation cost of newly built gas and coal power plants

In the opening a new era for solar power news item discussed in previous post, there was this rather puzzling paragraph (my emphasis): The deployment in solar PV and wind last year was accompanied by record-low auction prices, which fell as low as 3 cents per kwh (or kilowatt hour). Low announced prices for solar

2017-11-19 22:00   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Photovoltaic additions surpassing the net growth in coal: the birth of a new era of solar?

When I read the Bloomberg news article about solar capacity growing 50%, I was pretty disturbed. I was even more disturbed when I read its source: the IEA news article Solar PV grew faster than any other fuel in 2016, opening a new era for solar power. I could understand that the Bloomberg journalist might

2017-11-05 13:47   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: “Fifty percent growth of photovoltaics” in perspective of total energy consumption

Reading previous post one could remark that a 33% growth in photovoltaics (PV) is already an excellent result and rather close to 50% anyway, so what is the big deal about the IEA inflating a 33% growth to 50%? I think that none of the two numbers is representative for the impact PV has on

2017-10-28 23:47   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Solar grew by 50%: compared to what exactly?

In line with previous post (on the claim that solar is to surpass nuclear by the end of the year), there is this Bloomberg article titled Solar Grew Faster Than All Other Forms of Power for the First Time. A new IEA report claimed that: solar powered by photovoltaics, or PVs, grew by 50 percent,

2017-10-19 22:42   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Solar to “surpass” nuclear by end 2017

Another tweet that grabbed my attention this week: The text of the tweet: Speed of energy transition every day more jaw dropping. Solar to surpass nuclear by end 2017. That seems odd. In previous post I looked at the share of the different energy sources in worldwide primary energy use in 2006 and found that

2017-10-15 13:59   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Is Europe “quitting” fossil fuels “thanks to” solar energy?

Stumbled upon this tweet of Damien Ernst on solar energy: The text of the tweet: The map that shows that if Europe can quit fossil fuels thanks to solar energy, then the US can do it too. #ParisAgreement That map shows the sunshine hours in Europe compared to the United States and it is clear

2017-10-09 20:28   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: European fossil fuel “subsidies”: scraping the bottom of the barrel

A rather confusing news article from the Guardian written: European countries spend billions a year on fossil fuel subsidies, survey shows by Fiona Harvey. Eleven European countries were surveyed and it was found that those subsidies totalled to a huge number (my emphasis): Governments of 11 European nations are providing subsidies totalling more than £80bn

2017-10-03 21:51   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Belgium fossil-fuel free in nine … err … ten steps

While looking for more information on the fossil-fuel free in nine steps campaign (see previous post), I encountered a similar looking campaign: ten measures to ban fossil energy to the past. It was similar because nine of the ten measures/steps were identical in both campaigns, though they were placed in a different order. Unlike the

2017-09-29 21:10   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Belgium fossil-fuel free in nine steps

According to the Flemish Green party, Belgium can become fossil-fuel free and in a video they identified nine steps (translated from Dutch) to do that. When I found this article this week on their website, I was rather curious how they envisioned becoming fossil-free. Until then, I came across vague claims. Unfortunately, this campaign is

2017-09-20 22:04   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: IPCC AR6: continue assessing the science of climate change in line with policymakers’ priorities

This week, I came across this tweet from the IPCC: Apparently, there is (in the meantime “was”) a meeting in Montreal to agree the outlines of AR6. Interesting. However, it was the quote of Youba Sokona that caught my attention (my emphasis): “This meeting will pave the way for IPCC scientists to continue assessing the

2017-09-10 21:31   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: The fifty-times-more-deaths-by-weather news item: the contribution of the “expert”

In previous two posts, I explained a television news item explaining the scientific paper in which was proposed that there would be fifty times more deaths in the period 2070 to 2100. This post will focus on the dubious contribution of the expert in that news item. It was not really clear to me why

2017-09-03 23:00   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: The one and only solution

Continuing from previous post in which I described the start of a television news item on the modeled impacts of future weather on Europe. After that introduction, an expert was brought up to explain the paper a bit more, in this case Serge De Gheldere. As far as I know, he is an engineer (specialized

2017-08-21 00:06   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Fifty times more deaths by weather

The hyperbole level was high in this news item from the VTM news of last Saturday: Fifty Times More Deaths By Weather. This is how it is introduced (translated from Dutch): South and Central Europe are moaning under a heatwave these days and this has consequences. In Italy, for example, is it up to 46

2017-08-07 22:30   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Cancer risks versus Climate risks

It was quite hectic in the last month. Now the dust is slowly starting to settle, I will try to pick up blogging again. The subject of previous post was the statement that climate scientists are as certain about climate risks as oncologists on cancer risks that come with smoking. I ended that post being

2017-07-31 22:18   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: “Climate Risks” as conclusive as the link between Smoking and Lung cancer?

Via the Cliscep post “Don’t call me an alarmist,” says alarmist, I landed on this livescience article: Treading the Fine Line Between Climate Talk and Alarmism. It is an op-ed written by Sarah E. Myhre about climate change communication and her wish not being called an alarmist. One thing that caught my attention in the

2017-06-25 22:15   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: selecting 33 answers in just ONE minute?

Looking at the data of the second experiment of the Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation paper, I came across something rather strange. The time to complete the survey was recorded also and some of the participants finished the survey in an incredibly short timespan. Let me first explain how I got there. I incidentally stumbled on

2017-06-17 18:26   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: the conclusion that could not be a conclusion

This is already the third post on the Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation paper of Cook, Lewandowsky and Ecker (2017). This post will focus on one paragraph in the general conclusions of this paper (my emphasis): The ongoing focus on questioning the consensus, in concert with the gateway belief status of perceived consensus, underscores the importance

2017-06-10 12:24   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: false balance and the perceived consensus

When I hear the complaint that there is a problem with false balance media coverage in the climate debate, then I am always surprised. False balance meaning both sides of the debate getting equal time, so the perception is that they are both equally likely, even when this is not the case. Personally, I am

2017-06-09 00:19   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: definitions (or the lack thereof)

John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky (together with Ulrich Ecker) have released a new paper at the beginning of May 2017. It is called Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. The paper is about (skeptical) “misconceptions” and how to “neutralize” them by means of the inoculation theory. It is a topic…

2017-06-04 21:51   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: how to find a correlation where none might exist

Since recently I discovered that there is a whole field of what is called ecopsychology. A couple days ago I started reading a paper by Amel, Manning, Scott and Koger (probably more about that later) and I wondered whether those four had previous papers as well on the subject. Apparently they had. Members of this

2017-05-25 23:54   Click to comment

Trust, yet verify: It is not fair!

Yet another puzzling Facebook post from the owner of the Tesla powerwall (translated from Dutch, my bold emphasis): Thanks to the backwards running meter, we did NOT receive an electricity invoice in the first 7 years (there are no fixed cost at Ecopower). However, this is not fair, since we have still put 70% (see

2017-05-01 05:39   Click to comment

comments powered by Disqus